By: Pastor Jonathan Williams

The mere factors of "titles" usually raises more than it's share of valid questions concerning structure and purpose. Unfortunately, most within the world who would refer to themselves as "Christians" truly have no concept whatsoever of exactly what that means. I feel that the first objective for any Christian witness would be to carry out YHWH's (God's) "will", which begins with bearing witness of His glory! Realizing imediately that those around you, for the vast amount of them, will begin to persecute you and try to condemn your beliefs, usually for their lack of understanding. This practice is so widespread that, again, most supposed Christians have allowed themselves to become pacifists instead of "defenders of the Faith". Of course their Ministers tell them that Christ only spoke of love, peace, and joy. But Ministers fail most of the time to explain that Christ's compassion was limited to the chosen of Israel, those who he said were "of the promise". No I do not speak of those called "Jews", as those individuals were known in the Bible as Edomites, or descendants of Esau/ Cain. This is fluently taught in the doctrine of "Two-seedline". But nevertheless, Israelites are NEVER refered to as being Jews, this is just a fallacy that Ministers have exploited to have corrupt minds support them and their undying lusts after "Jew-lies".

No "True" Israelite would proclaim the title of being a Jew, for that would go directly against Scripture.

"Christian Identity" in name simply means that we (His chosen) are finally (as he said we eventually would) accepting His truths, and gathering the remnant for His purpose!

This is a very common question raised to Identity believers, especially by those who are coming out of "Judeo-Christianity". But facts are facts. Nearly every Bible holds a manner of the Truth, but as time excells before us, each Bible version gets more polluted and watered-down with translation. A sad fact, but still a fact.

Now the "King James" version (and all it's variations) eminate from what is commonly known as the "1611 King James". This particular version was likely the fifty-seventh translation of the Holy Scriptures, and very definently holds more mistranslation than previous versions, as it is based on them in full. Scholars and publishers alike all agree on the massive amounts of mistranslation within the confines of this version, but there are still those out there who claim that it is justified as being the ONLY "True" word of God. This is false. The "King James" version holds no prominence over earlier editions, and likely many of the later ones.

Someone trying to study Scripture must first realize that the Bible, in it's fullest content, was provided in three languages: Hebrew (not jewish), Aramaic, and Greek.

Geography can never define race, as any educated person can see with their own eyes.

Therefore the translation of Scripture must hold true to it's roots of origin, words must be accurately assessed. But the "King James" Bible IS JUST AS LEGITIMATE as more timely proven editions, but one must always bear in mind the facts stated above concerning translation. A "Strong's Concordance" w/ Hebrew Lexicon can be a person's most effective tool in studying Scripture. Just remember as with the Bible, everything which exists to promote and glorify YHWH (God), always has an adversary in the shadows, and lack of Scriptural knowledge could end up being your plight.

It is very dangerous for an individual to literally ignore reality just to suit the ignorance of those foolish around him. Let me begin by saying that I am fully aware of the controversy this issue brings, and I am also aware of the many naysayers who wish to discredit YHWH's Ministry, and attribute the message to simply being "anti-semitic" or "bigoted". I can assure the reader though that these things are simply false, and can be refuted here very abruptly.

First of all, the Bible is concerned with only one Race, and that is Israel (anglo-saxons). However the other Races are explained within Scripture concerning their different origins, their plights compared to Israelites, and even their occassional involvement with matters at hand. Beyond that though, one must remember that there are several examples forbidding race-mixing, and the punishment is pretty severe to say the least! Note these Scriptures below:

Now you can clearly see above that race-mixing is not only abhorred by YHWH, but he rewards those who rise against it. Imagine that, and your average so-called "preacher" won't tell you that because it's not "politically correct". But "Truth" always prevails, just think about it.

Now concerning the Jews.

This particular subject should have every Christian's blood boiling to temperature's never reached, but most people who claim the title of "Christian" use the term "judeo-Christian" which actually proclaims that you are not Christian at all, but a worshiper of Jews...let's take a look at it. Judeo means "jew god".

Israelite and Jew are NOT interchangeable.

The word "Jew" is used and abused within translated Scripture so badly that it left a perfect opening in History for Cannanites, Edomites, Khazars, Shepphardium, and others descended from Cain in Genesis to lay claim to the title of "Israelites" once translation had become dictated by rulers as opposed to Scholars. Just look at the time frame.

During the captivities Israel faced in the Bible (Old Testament) the Seed of Cain was already slithering into a new framework. The false Identity the Jews claim to suffer the persecution of.

In reading actual translation you will find that Eve never ate a literal piece of fruit, nor was the "serpent" a snake we commonly view. The "partaking of fruit" spoken of in Genesis reads differently in the Hebrew. The "serpent" actually means "enchanter", which Satan (Lucifer) would certainly have been. The "beguiling of Eve" by Lucifer was an actuall advancement of seduction, which did procure. Eve was "sexually seduced" by the Serpent or "Enchanter", therefore Genesis 3:15 explains the everlasting battle between good and evil caused by this infraction. Realizing this is still quite difficult for someone who has never heard this message, it still abounds with the "Truth" as it is written originally.

Cain's "seed" was very different from Adam's, as Adam was not Cain's father, therefore Seth is named as the first son of Adam.

Take note here of the first instance of Seth's mentioning coinciding with being the first mention of Adam "begatting" anyone:

In all actuality the mere mention of Abel here is signifigant because of the factor "what could have been", a restless notion scholars have argued and lost sleep over for centuries. But it can be verifiably said that Seth was Adam's first offspring, as this was not the case in the "beguilment of Eve" whereas the Devil himself caused the pregnancy.

Incidentally, the word "Adam" in Hebrew actually means to "show blood in the face", or "cheeks become rosy". Think about that. Not every Race can blush red in their face, but the Anglo-saxons do it perfectly crimson. Seth's lineage was the pure, blood-faced Adamites, while Cain's Race of devils was polluting the world's bloodlines since their inception with race-mixing, and tactics of promoting abortion for Adamite children.

Now much can be written about these dispicable Jews (the race of Cain), but it will be better for the Scriptures to speak for themselves:

"Semitic" is a word describing the lineage of Shem, son of Noah. This is the parent lineage of the Israelites spoken of concerning their aspect of linguistical origin. In other words, the original Hebrew language can be stemmed almost assuredly from this particular brand of the lineage, not a later split between "tribes" as once widely considered as fact. It would be absolutely preposterous for anyone to call a Christian Identist "anti-semitic" because it would be impossible for a Caucasion Israelite (stemming from the Shemitic bloodlines) to be against their own blood-belief.

Again as well, who is it who carried the term "Christian" down through the ages?

It certainly wasn't those known as Jews today, as they are wreckless in every manner towards Christendom, and therefore are the eternal enemy of the Christian cause.

The Anglo-Saxon man carried Christendom down through the ages, but because of perpetual Spirituality, not selfish incredulity. And the filthy Jews had nothing to do with keeping the "Laws" intact. Likewise they have scaled about destroying every seemed utterance of the observance of "Mosaic Law" when it concerns someone of Caucasion descent. Think about it White Man!

The fact is that most people will search no further than their local Minister, which gives them a one-way ticket into the depths of Hell no doubt. I would rather have assurance because I was intelligent enough to seek these things out as we were asked by the Father. This leson could go on for ages, but isn't that prcisely the point. To seek out one's destiny by understanding the past is not a sin, in fact it is demanded for His people. As with everything, we continue to search out the Truth, no matter how distasteful it may seem to some when displayed, and no matter how dangerous these truths may end up being for our personal existance on this earth.